London, 7 February 2012: The world human rights organization, Amnesty International, has reiterated its demand for the repeal of the black law, Armed Forces Special Powers Act from Kashmir.
Amnesty International’s Director on Asia-Pacific, Sam Zarifi, in a statement posted on the official website of the world human rights body, said that Indian army personnel facing charges of serious violations of human rights must stand trial, instead of hiding behind the controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act. Citing a recent judgement of the Indian Supreme Court, the Amnesty said that the Indian army could not invoke the controversial Act to avoid the prosecution of its troops charged with incidents like the killing of five Kashmiri villagers at Pathribal in Islamabad in March 2000.
The personnel of Indian army must stand trial when facing charges of serious violations of human rights, instead of hiding behind the draconian Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA), said international wacth dog, Amnesty International today.
On 4 February, India’s Supreme Court stated that the Indian army could not invoke the AFSPA to avoid the prosecution of eight Indian army officers charged with the March 2000 killing of five Kashmiri villagers at Pathribal.
Under the often criticized special powers, Indian army personnel cannot be prosecuted for human rights violations without approval from the Indian government.
“We welcome the Supreme Court’s statement that there should be no need to obtain prior approval for prosecuting security personnel charged with having committed grave human rights violations such as rape and murder,” Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific Program Director Sam Zarifi said.
“While the Court’s remark opens the chance for the prosecution of the eight Indian army personnel Amnesty International reiterates its demand for the repeal of the AFSPA, which has been in force in various parts of north-east in India for over five decades and in Jammu and Kashmir since 1990,” Sam Zarifi said.
Recent information obtained by human rights defenders in India states that, of the 50 instances in which the authorities in Jammu and Kashmir had sought approval for prosecuting Indian troops for grave human rights violations - including torture, rape and extra-judicial executions - the Indian home ministry has said it had “recommended” approval in eight cases and the Defence ministry none.
“For far too long, Indian security forces have used the AFSPA as a cover for serious human rights violations. The Supreme Court’s statement should finally allow some light to be shed on some of the army’s most gruesome violations – providing some hope for justice for the victims and a step forward imposing the rule of law,” said Sam Zarifi.
The Supreme Court’s statement came in a case has pitted the army against India’s premier investigating agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The armed forces had claimed that the five were Lashkar-e-Toiba guerrillas involved in the shooting of 35 members of the Sikh community at Chhattisingpura in the valley prior to the visit of the then United States’ President Bill Clinton to India in the same month. The CBI’s investigation showed that the five people killed were in fact villagers from Brariangan, Halan and Islamabad.
“The AFSPA has provisions giving protection to personnel engaged in armed operations in designated areas from any legal proceedings unless it is approved by the Indian government,” Sam Zarifi said, adding that “this rarely happens in practice, as a result of which these laws have provided impunity for perpetrators of grave human rights violations.” Source Amnesty International.